Kyle Jamieson is always looking for the perfect ball, the perfect plan

After a tepid home summer, the New Zealand seamer is focusing on growing his game further. He talks about being the fourth prong of a highly skilled attack

Alan Gardner30-May-2022Kyle Jamieson is a man of impressive numbers. His 6ft 8in frame, for a start, puts him among the tallest sportsmen who aren’t involved in the NBA. Then there is his Test bowling record. Since making his debut just over two years ago, Jamieson has taken 66 wickets at 18.72 in 14 Tests, striking once every 43.5 balls. Few among those who have taken a minimum of 50 wickets have combined such a low average with such a lethal strike rate in Test cricket since Sydney Barnes more than 100 years ago.You might also throw in the Rs 15 crore – that is 150,000,000 rupees, just over US$2 million – paid by Royal Challengers Bangalore to acquire Jamieson’s services in the 2021 IPL auction. Although nine wickets and an economy of 9.60 for that price tag were eye-catching for the wrong reasons. For now, the IPL remains unfinished business.None of these markers mean too much to Jamieson. “No, I’m not really a stats guy,” he says, long limbs squeezed into one of the white plastic seats in front of the pavilion in Hove. The ICC’s No. 5-ranked bowler, and self-described “fourth prong” of New Zealand’s Test attack, is staring out into the gloom that has descended on Sussex’s tight little ground, rain drumming intermittently on the roof, as he considers a series of questions about just how good he is, and just how good he be.Related

Southee: 'The Kiwi way is to muck in and get the best out of what we've got'

ESPNcricinfo Awards 2021 Test bowling winner: Kyle Jamieson's five-for

Jamieson on sitting out IPL auction – 'Time to work on my game'

Fletcher: 'Took me a long time to figure out the player I wanted to be'

NZ slip to warm-up defeat after Compton's fifth hundred of summer

“For me, that stuff sort of just happens, it comes and goes, and it’ll go up and go down over the course of my career,” he says. “If I’m trying to get better and learn and grow, those things are going to take care of themselves. I think sometimes that [your average] does measure where you are at but sometimes it doesn’t necessarily reflect that. You can be getting better and grow as a person, as a player, but it’s not necessarily reflected in the numbers.”It’s easy to see why people get excited by Jamieson, numbers aside. Despite being more of a batter while growing up, he has taken giant strides – quite literally – since he moved his focus to bowling in his late teens. Able to deliver the ball from a height of 2.3m, and to generate the sort of awkward bounce that makes playing forward an act of folly, Jamieson can also swing it both ways from a fuller length than most, all while generating speeds up to 140kph/87mph. Such a formidable array of attributes has seen him described as pretty much the perfect fast bowler.He chuckles wryly at that. While his height is simply a blessing of the genes – “I can certainly thank my parents for that” – there has been plenty of hard work put in since Dayle Hadlee, older brother of Richard, spotted Jamieson’s potential as a bowler ahead of the 2014 Under-19 World Cup.”I’m just trying to grow my game and I don’t think there’s any sort of perfect fast bowler,” Jamieson says. “There’s a lot of different guys that have done it a lot of different ways and been very successful for a long period of time. I’m just trying to grab little bits from those guys and add to my game, where it’s applicable, and try and get to my definition of perfect.”What would that definition be? “There’s a few little things that I’ll probably keep to myself,” he says with a smile. “But yeah, I have a pretty clear vision in my head around the cricketer I want to be. I’m just trying to chase that as much as I can. That’s what I’ll hang my hat on in the time to come.”

Being a force across all three formats is one of the challenges that motivates him, as well as improving his returns with the bat. Jamieson has five first-class fifties, with a highest score of 67 – although some England fans might remember him flaying a 110-ball hundred against them during a tour game in 2017-18. That hints at a Ben Stokes-like ability to change games with either bat or ball, and Jamieson agrees that “genuine allrounder” is the label he aspires to.”I’m still a long way off the batter I want to be,” he says. “I’d love to be contributing more runs. I think I’m still relatively fresh in that area. How do I balance that, how do I improve? And my white-ball stuff as well – that’s probably the thing that numbers don’t necessarily always show. I know that I’m so young in my career, there’s still a long way to get to where I want to go. It’s just about trying to put in those yards around the specifics I want to improve on.”I’m a long way off that finished product but certainly that genuine allrounder is what I’m trying to strive for, and understanding that there’s a lot of time to come before I reach that point. But it certainly motivates me to keep going.”

****

After his barnstorming start to Test cricket, in particular, the last couple of months have given Jamieson a little time to “reassess where things are at, look at some of the lessons I’ve had and then plan ahead where I take my game”.Having been released by RCB less than a year after that life-changing payday, he decided against entering the 2022 IPL mega auction, prioritising instead a period at home in Auckland with his family that also allowed him to work on the fundamentals of his cricket. Time spent by the beach, playing golf, and satisfying a love of Italian food helped recharge the batteries after two years as an international cricketer that overlapped almost completely with the era of biosecure bubbles and travel restrictions brought about by Covid-19.Jamieson has dismissed Virat Kohli three times in four Tests, including twice in the World Test Championship final•Alex Davidson/Getty ImagesBoth Jamieson and New Zealand experienced a dip in form during the southern summer just past. The reigning World Test champions could only manage two 1-1 series draws, against Bangladesh and South Africa; Jamieson’s 14 wickets, meanwhile, came at a more modest 28.71. New Zealand currently sit sixth on the table for the 2021-23 WTC cycle. If they are to qualify again for the final, and have a chance to defend their title, they need to do well in the upcoming three-Test series against an England side languishing down at the bottom.For Jamieson, this is all part of the journey. Few would have tipped New Zealand to lift the inaugural WTC trophy when the concept was undergoing its tortuous genesis in the mid-2010s. And while Jamieson’s name has been mentioned in the same breath as some of New Zealand’s greats during his rapid ascent, he remains rapt just to be involved alongside Tim Southee, Trent Boult and Neil Wagner as arguably the best Test fast-bowling attack going.”Hundred per cent” he says, when asked if he still sees himself as the junior member of the attack. “Those guys have played, I don’t know how many Tests, but all of them have played over 50 Tests, two of them have taken over 300 Test wickets, and Waggy’s [Neil Wagner’s] not far behind. So I’m certainly the fourth prong of that attack.”Just love being a part of the group. I count myself so fortunate to come in at that time, [with] those guys at the peak of their powers and just to learn off them. Certainly a lot of the success I’ve had has been down to those guys.”Nevertheless, that success includes memorable dismissals of some of the best batters in Test cricket. Jamieson’s first two wickets, in Wellington in February 2020, were Cheteshwar Pujara and Virat Kohli; he has since removed Pujara three more times and Kohli twice, including a peach of an lbw at a crucial juncture in the WTC final in Southampton last June. That came as part of a five-wicket haul, which also included Rohit Sharma caught in the cordon.”Not so much the moments when you get wickets and stuff, it’s the team stuff I’ll cherish for as long as I live”•Kai Schwoerer/Getty ImagesAt Lord’s, a couple of weeks beforehand, he dealt with both the slope and Joe Root, England’s captain, done by perfect length off the very first ball of day. At Hagley Oval in 2021, Fawad Alam was practically guillotined by a vicious bouncer, while a personal favourite is the laser-like inswinger that sliced through Mohammad Rizwan (three dismissals in two Tests) as part of an 11-wicket haul in the same game.But rather than bask in such personal triumphs, Jamieson prefers to focus on what might be New Zealand’s special sauce: their togetherness as a group.”I think, for me, the moments tend to be more around the team stuff. I remember sitting in the change room after my first Test and just soaking up that win. Sitting in the change room after the [WTC] final and seeing a lot of the guys that have been part of the New Zealand set-up for such a long period of time and been through an immense amount of stuff to get to that position, just to see the pure joy on their faces was something I hold pretty dear. Not so much the moments when you get wickets and stuff, but it’s the team stuff I’ll cherish for as long as I live.”Predictably, Jamieson also plays down his ability to target the opposition’s best: “I think most people could look at a team sheet and know there’s a few key wickets, but it doesn’t necessarily mean the other ones aren’t key either.”But again it is the numbers that do the talking for him. While his ratio of top-order wickets – 48 of his 66 Test dismissals have been batters in the top seven – is not remarkable, the cost of those wickets is. An average of 21.13 puts him behind only Axar Patel (13.5) and Ollie Robinson (20.7), for bowlers who have taken 30-plus top-seven wickets since his debut. Restrict the sample to batters in the top five, and Jamieson is well out in front with 35 at 19.70.”I’m a long way off that finished product but certainly that genuine allrounder is what I’m trying to strive for”•Getty Images”You’re always trying to make an impact, regardless of who the batter is at the other end,” he says. “As a bowler your job is to take wickets and try to take them early in the game as much as you can, which tends to be the top-order guys. Some days it’ll fall to me, some days it’ll fall to Timmy and Trent and Wags. But it’s how do we as a collective take 20 wickets?”

****

Never mind a lab-built fast-bowling monster, Jamieson might well be something far scarier: a quick who is always thinking about his game. Although still fairly new to international cricket, at 27, he has been grafting away for several years to bring all those aforementioned attributes together in one package.Despite the obvious attractions of attempting to constantly bomb batters from the crease, Jamieson’s methods are more varied. “The short ball’s part of the plan,” he says, “as is moving the ball different directions and different angles of attack on the crease.” He describes finding the outside edge for a catch in the cordon as his most satisfying form of dismissal, and has long focused on overcoming the tall bowler’s natural aversion to pitching it up.”I think that’s something right from when I started to switch more to bowling around U-19. It was always: how do you bowl fuller but still be heavy? That’s something I’m always trying to try to work on, [to] not bowl that floaty full ball. As a tall guy your natural length’s probably more back of a length, but you’re constantly trying to find that balance between getting it up and still being heavy.”You’re always trying to just drill that stuff. You come to training, you’re trying to find what that length is, trying to be heavy; you’re asking the batter for feedback around that length – what does it feel like? Hopefully you can be in that right area for longer periods and create some pressure.”More than two-thirds of Jamieson’s Test wickets have been those of top-seven batters, at an impressive average of 21.13•ICC via GettyAs with Jamieson’s pivotal dismissal of Kohli on the third morning of the WTC final, this is a finely calibrated approach. Having realised that collectively they had bowled too short on the second day (the first having been lost to rain), it was New Zealand’s “fourth prong” who set about rectifying the situation. Six deliveries were all Jamieson required to triangulate a way through Kohli’s defences.It is this never-ending battle of wits that keeps Jamieson ticking.”You’re always thinking. That’s the process between when you bowl the ball and walking back, reflecting on what happened there. How do I feel getting to the crease, what was the outcome of that ball? Constantly doing the cycle of trying to find the right area and work towards a plan. There’s always natural variation: sometimes the ball’s a little bit fuller than what you want, a little bit shorter than what you want, but it ends up working out for you. That’s just the process of any bowler or any bowling unit. It’s constantly reflecting and trying to find that perfect ball or that perfect plan to swing the game in your favour.”However you define fast-bowling perfection, that seems a pretty good place to start.

Chahal finds success again by going back to his strengths

“My strength is to turn the ball, to get it to dip. I strayed from that itself [in the last game],” says the legspinner

Hemant Brar15-Jun-20224:18

Jaffer: Wristspinners need to be brave and Chahal was

It’s often said that if you keep doing the same thing over and over again, you cannot expect different results. But if you want the same results, you should perhaps keep repeating the same thing. That’s what Yuzvendra Chahal found out in the third T20I against South Africa in Visakhapatnam.Chahal came into the series as India’s lead spinner. He had an excellent IPL 2022, where he topped the wickets chart with 27 scalps in 17 outings. But the returns of none for 26 from 2.1 overs and 1 for 49 from four in the first two games in the ongoing series left a lot to be desired.Related

  • Harshal, Chahal ensure India stay alive in the series

In the second match, especially, Chahal consistently pushed the ball through instead of looking to turn it. That allowed the South Africa batters to hit him through the line with little worry.After the game, Chahal sat with the coaching staff to figure out what he could do differently. The answer was he should revert to what had previously worked for him.So on Tuesday, Chahal was back to his tried and tested method – bowling more legbreaks and varying the pace. The desired results were back too as he picked up 3 for 20 and helped India register their first win in the series.Chasing 180, South Africa lost their openers, Temba Bavuma and Reeza Hendricks, inside the powerplay. But for India, it was their middle order that had been a thorn in the flesh – Rassie van der Dussen and David Miller in the first match and Heinrich Klaasen in the second.Chahal, though, ensured there was no repeat. Perhaps expecting dew later on, which didn’t prove to be the case, Rishabh Pant introduced Chahal into the attack as early as the fifth over.Yuzvendra Chahal claimed 3 for 20 in his four overs•BCCIChahal gave away only two runs in his first over. In his next, he got Rassie van der Dussen caught behind as the batter went for a cut. Dwaine Pretorius too fell in the same manner, trying to cut a fast legbreak only to edge it to Pant.That left South Africa on 57 for 4 after the ninth over but Klaasen was still in the middle.Before Tuesday, Klaasen had ransacked 74 runs off 28 balls against Chahal, at a strike rate of 264.28. In the second T20I, he smashing 30 off 13 balls against Chahal was a big point of difference after Bhuvneshwar Kumar’s three early wickets had put South Africa on the back foot.But here, Chahal kept Klaasen guessing by varying his line. When he returned in the 15th over, he tossed one up wide outside off. By then the asking rate had touched 15 and Klaasen had no other option than to go after it. He ended up miscuing and Axar Patel, backpedalling from extra-cover, held onto the catch. The match went on till the 19th over but the contest was over with Klaasen’s wicket.”In the last game, I was bowling a lot of sliders, and I was also bowling a bit faster,” Chahal said at the post-match presentation. “So even when I was bowling good balls, I wasn’t getting any turn. It was going like a flipper.”My strength is to turn the ball, to get it to dip. I strayed from that itself. So it became very easy for batsmen as the ball was just going straight.”Tonight I changed the seam position and bowled fast legbreaks in order to get some help [from the pitch]. I tried to vary my line too so that the batsmen cannot predict.”The plan was to just bowl to my strength. I was anyway going for runs, but if I bowl to my strength and still go for 40-45 runs, I would pick up at least three wickets too, which didn’t happen in the last game. And when you dismiss two batsmen in the middle order, the pressure shifts on the batting side.”If India are to secure the series, they must win the remaining two games as well. Chahal could play a big part in that, perhaps by doing more of the same.

Pakistan's strength is also their weakness in T20Is

The numbers for batters four to eight are impressive, but the top three probably don’t trust them enough

Danyal Rasool26-Aug-20222:15

Babar: ‘Injuries are part of the game, Pakistan’s bench strength is good’

At first glance, Pakistan’s over-reliance on their top three in ODIs appears to bleed over into T20I cricket, too. Not unlike in the 50-over format, top three are responsible for roughly two-thirds – 67.5% – of Pakistan’s runs in T20Is since the start of the 2021 World Cup. As in ODIs, this figure is by some distance the highest among all sides, India’s top three a distant second, responsible for 58.4% of their team’s runs.And there isn’t much evidence of runs coming from further down for Pakistan either. Since the last T20 World Cup, only two players outside the top three have scored 100 runs in the format, and there’s little clarity on the personnel that make up Pakistan’s best middle order. Take that to the start of 2021: no one from the middle order has managed 200 T20I runs. What Fakhar Zaman, Imam-ul-Haq and Babar Azam do for the ODI side, Babar, Mohammad Rizwan and Fakhar do in T20Is.Related

  • Babar Azam struggling inelegantly? Is this for real?

  • Top teams 'one step ahead' of Pakistan in T20 batting approach, says chief selector Wasim

  • Pakistan have more runs in their line-up, but they are refusing to score them

  • Plan for Pakistan: Open with Fakhar, send Babar or Rizwan at No. 3

  • The lovey-dovey rivalry between India and Pakistan

Anyone with even a passing interest in Pakistan cricket doesn’t need numbers to know this. Babar’s T20 consistency and Rizwan’s sensational rebirth in the format at the top of the order, combined with Fakhar’s brute force at one-drop are what form the base of a Pakistan T20I innings now. The middle order is unreliable, players picked and dropped after a few games, most likely failing to have any discernible impact. Azam Khan came and went, Khushdil Shah hasn’t really taken to the format, and, perhaps too often, Shadab Khan, Faheem Ashraf, Iftikhar Ahmed and Asif Ali have flattered to deceive internationally. So, naturally, the top three make most of the runs, are top scorers in most games Pakistan win, and have to face most of the overs.That last bit is crucial, and often overlooked. While Babar, Rizwan and Fakhar have scored 67.5% of Pakistan’s T20I runs since the last World Cup, they have faced an incredible 72% of the deliveries. Of course, no other top three has faced even 60% of deliveries internationally, and this is also the largest negative variance – 4.5% – for any top three between runs scored and balls faced in that period. South Africa’s top three at the second least productive, facing 3.5% more balls than the runs they score, but unlike Pakistan, they do leave 51.3% of balls for the middle order to make up the shortfall.Pakistan’s top-order batters rarely allow the middle order in early, and almost never in the powerplay, where the intent has been most notably lacking. Since the start of January 2020, Babar, who has faced more balls as opener than anyone else for Pakistan in this period, has scored at just 6.72 runs per over in powerplays, averaging around 20 off 18 balls. Rizwan scores at 7.20, and while Fakhar is well ahead at 7.80, his powerplay exposure is lower, because he comes in at three. Whether he should open, particular when Pakistan bat first, has been looked at, but those numbers inevitably result in Pakistan leaving most of their aggression for the latter stages of an innings.ESPNcricinfo LtdOne might think the top three are forced into this approach because of the instability lower down, but that might not be quite on point. It’s true there’s a game of musical chairs on there, but whoever gets in there tends to produce the firepower Pakistan invariably need. Surprisingly for a middle order as wobbly as Pakistan’s, in 13 matches since the last World Cup, batters from No. 4 to No. 8 have scored at 152.18, the highest among all T20I sides since then.While Pakistan generally do not begrudge Babar and Rizwan opening in a chase, it can be especially jarring to see Babar using up vast numbers of deliveries in the first innings. For all of Babar’s qualities, he’s not quite proven himself to be the best judge of what a good first-innings score is, and if he has, his ability to bat accordingly is questionable. In all T20s for Pakistan or Karachi Kings since January 2020, Babar’s first-innings strike rate is 123.02. This jumps to 133.42 batting second, with the average ballooning from 36.56 to 61.70.Moving Fakhar up to the top when Pakistan bat first is a statistically sound option: since January 2017, Fakhar’s T20 strike rate as opener is 139.65, the highest among Pakistani openers besides Kamran Akmal, but the solution can extend beyond just the one switch.Curiously, Pakistan’s middle and lower-middle order are more effective when they bat first. Since the last World Cup, Pakistan batters outside the top three manage a strike rate of 161.11 in such situations, the highest once more. South Africa are next at 159.07, but after that, England’s 141.37 is as good as any side has mustered. That number drops to 142.19 when Pakistan chase, higher than all sides bar India, whose middle and lower-middle order are prolific in a chase, striking at 157.79.ESPNcricinfo LtdSo what does that tell us, apart from telling us that Pakistan should try and avoid batting first against India in their Asia Cup games?The way a Pakistan batting unit behaves depending on when they bat means a one-size-fits-all approach cannot be the most efficient way to wring the last run out of their T20I innings. The status quo might well be fine when they chase; it is probably the best way to get the most out of this outfit. But when Pakistan bat first, Babar, and to a lesser extent the other two at the top, simply cannot consume the number of deliveries they do, when statistically the world’s most explosive middle order sits in the dugout, powerless to have the impact on the game the numbers show they can.Perhaps Pakistan’s two most consequential T20I games in the last decade crystallise this side’s batting ability perfectly. Against India in their World Cup’s opening game, they played to their strengths, and there’s arguably no better pair than Babar and Rizwan when chasing a total – especially a below-par one. Against Australia in the semi-final 16 days later, that same reliability became a crutch that hobbled the innings right to the end. Pakistan left runs out there, runs that mattered when Matthew Wade scooped Shaheen Afridi over fine leg 90 minutes later.Babar and Rizwan may have felt justified in their conservatism during that semi-final. If you don’t quite trust your middle order, the value you place on your wicket rises exponentially, especially in key games. It was perhaps reasonable for the openers to be sceptical on that occasion. But, in a format where all sorts of risks need to be taken, lending the middle order that trust is just another one that might be necessary. Because Rizwan and Babar batting together might be a beautiful sight to behold, but when they are setting a target, it can also be a worrying one.

Woodhill: 'Haris' four overs could determine the outcome of India-Pakistan match'

Rauf, who plays for Melbourne Stars in the BBL, has more experience at the MCG than any other bowler on either side

Alex Malcolm22-Oct-20222:06

Babar Azam – ‘We have confidence in our bowling unit’

The MCG can be an uncomfortable cauldron for most visiting cricketers, but it will feel like home for Haris Rauf.When Pakistan and India face off in Sunday’s blockbuster, no bowler on either side will have more T20 experience at the venue than Rauf.His rise from a Lahore Qalandars project player, to playing club cricket in Sydney and Hobart, to starring in the BBL for Melbourne Stars and then bursting into international scene has been quite extraordinary.Related

Shadab Khan is Pakistan's Mr T20, and it suits him fine

How to bat and bowl in each of Australia's T20 World Cup venues

Haris Rauf on India-Pakistan at the T20 World Cup: 'I'm very happy because it is at the MCG'

Haris Rauf sets sights on World T20 following meteoric rise

It was his first season with Stars in 2019-20 that set him on the path to becoming one of the best death bowlers in T20 cricket. Since the start of 2020, no bowler has taken more wickets in the death overs in T20Is than Rauf’s 37. One man who was influential in getting him to Stars was their former List Manager Trent Woodhill, who believes Rauf’s MCG experience could hold the key to the outcome of the Pakistan-India match.”I think Haris’ experience at the MCG makes Pakistan favourites,” Woodhill told ESPNcricinfo. “I think because [Jasprit] Bumrah is out, that’s a massive loss for India. And they are similar types of bowlers at the MCG where that slower ball grips and yorkers are hard to get under. I know it’s early in the season so things might be a little bit different. But I think the four overs from Haris probably determines the outcome of the game.”It’s hard to argue with the numbers. In seven T20s at the MCG, he has 11 wickets at a strike rate of 13.6 and an economy rate of 6.92. He took a hat-trick in his first game there for Stars, against Sydney Thunder. Stars couldn’t believe their luck when he landed in their lap following a spate of injuries and some quick thinking from then-general manager Nick Cummins, coach David Hussey and Woodhill. But what Stars didn’t expect was how well he would be suited to the MCG pitch itself.

“There are guys who are quick and then there are guys like Haris who have that different arm action,” Woodhill said. “Talking to batters, he is hard to pick up. And not only that, because he has got a good slower ball with the same arm action, if you want to play early to deal with the tailing ball and the pace, you could be well early and then you bring the stumps into play because you’re already through the shot and the slower ball has got you.”I think his action and speed and height really suit the MCG.”There is no better example of that deception than his BBL hat-trick. He knocked over both Matthew Gilkes and Callum Ferguson with slower balls before Daniel Sams set up for the slower ball deep in his crease and got beaten for pace to be trapped lbw.Rauf’s success at the death at the MCG belies conventional wisdom. Most pace bowlers in the death overs tend to use the up-and-down nature of the drop-in surface and the huge square boundaries to their advantage. Back-of-a-length and slower short balls are commonplace in the death overs there with full balls at risk of being clubbed over the short straight boundaries.

“He shared quite a bit of information with the bowlers and batters as well. The way he is improving as a bowler, leading the group, the way he didn’t let us feel Shaheen’s absence, the way he has done in all situations, that will be helpful for us”Babar Azam

But Rauf has no such fear. Woodhill compared him to an elite closer in baseball who enters in the late innings to get the best hitters out by fighting fire with fire.”I reckon he is probably the closest we have seen to a baseball closer in the BBL,” Woodhill said. “[Lasith] Malinga obviously was outstanding talent there also but he swings that new ball.”It felt like when Haris was coming at the ‘G in that patch, it was just lights out. You just knew that it was going to be really tough to get the ball away, especially in front of square and then good luck trying to ramp him too.”He’s not going to go for a lot of runs in those death overs because he is going to keep it really simple. He’s not going to change it up. You know you’re going to get a bouncer. You just don’t know when you’re going to get that bouncer. You know you’re going to get stump yorkers. It’s very rare he is going to go wide yorker.”But Woodhill noted that it would be a step up in class bowling to India’s lower middle order who would play him differently to the Australians in the BBL. Conditions in October may also be different to Rauf’s experience in December and January. The surfaces are unlikely to be as dry as they are in the BBL and his slower balls may not grip and bounce as awkwardly at the death.Rauf takes off after completing his hat-trick against Sydney Thunder•Robert Cianflone/Getty Images”It’ll be interesting to see how much he goes to that against India who are probably No. 1, with England No. 2, at just staying still and hitting the dead [slower] ball,” Woodhill said. “The Australians would play it differently. The Australians will move around a bit and they might be happy with multiple twos. India, I don’t think they’ll be thinking two straight up or single. They’ll be looking at that dead-ball hit and that’s where I think Haris becomes just so valuable to Pakistan.”Rauf’s match-up with Hardik Pandya could be vital. He removed him with a slower ball in the T20 World Cup last year in Dubai and conceded just 25 in four overs. But Hardik got his revenge in the Asia Cup striking three boundaries in Rauf’s 19th over to close out the chase in the group match.His captain Babar Azam revealed Rauf has been both a vital resource in Pakistan’s preparations for the MCG and a vital cog in their attack, particularly with the recent absence of Shaheen Shah Afridi.”He shared quite a bit of information with the bowlers and batters as well,” Babar said. “The way he is improving as a bowler, leading the group, the way he didn’t let us feel Shaheen’s absence, the way he has done in all situations, that will be helpful for us.”One thing is for certain, Rauf will revel in wearing green at the MCG once again.

A new chapter in Lanning-Harmanpreet captaincy saga

After finishing second to Lanning in many high-stake games over the years, Harmanpreet will want to finally get one past her

S Sudarshanan25-Mar-2023Despite a bit of festive fervour to it, both Meg Lanning and Harmanpreet Kaur were focused on the eve of the inaugural WPL final. As captains of their respective national teams, they are quite used to this routine. After all, they led Australia and India in two title clashes that played a big part in the changing landscape of women’s cricket in the last three years – the 2020 T20 World Cup final that attracted 86,174 people at the MCG, and the gold-medal match in Birmingham last year, when women’s T20 cricket featured for the first time in the Commonwealth Games.Lanning and Harmanpreet have been T20I captains for a long period now. Lanning has led Australia in 100 of the 132 T20Is she has played. Harmanpreet has done the same for India in 96 of her 151 T20I outings. But when the two teams have met each other with Lanning and Harmanpreet at the helm, Australia have often had the upper hand, winning ten T20Is to India’s three. And one needs no reminding that while Lanning’s trophy cabinet is running out of space, India Women’s recent Under-19 victory is their only global title.So, Sunday’s final is not just about Mumbai Indians taking on Delhi Capitals. Harmanpreet will want to finally get one past Lanning in a high-stakes game.Both Harmanpreet and Lanning are equally passionate leaders, but they operate in very different ways. Harmanpreet is someone who wears her heart on her sleeve. Consider Alyssa Healy’s dismissal in the Eliminator. Harmanpreet was pumped up after taking the catch to dismiss the UP Warriorz captain, making it evident through her celebration how much that wicket meant for Mumbai.Meg Lanning is the leading run-scorer in the WPL•BCCIOn the other hand, Lanning is almost inscrutable. After Capitals beat Warriorz in their last league match to confirm direct qualification to the final, all she offered was applause from the dugout and hugs.Some of Harmanpreet’s headline-grabbing knocks in international cricket have come against Australia. Her 171 not out in the semi-final of the 2017 ODI World Cup – she wasn’t the captain then – against the Lanning-led Australia was what made women’s cricket in India mainstream. She has been in the midst of it all – the high of a group-stage win over Australia in the T20 World Cup in 2018 and the lows of a narrow loss in the tri-series final in 2020, the Commonwealth Games final, and more recently, the heartbreaking loss in the semi-final of the T20 World Cup last month.Harmanpreet has been an epitome of consistency in this WPL. She kicked off the competition in grand style with an enthralling 30-ball 65, and has only twice been dismissed before reaching 20. She has been the rock that’s held Mumbai’s middle order together and has struck three half-centuries, second only to Tahlia McGrath’s four, in the tournament.Lanning has had an even better tournament. She’s been the leading run-getter for most of the WPL and is the only player among the finalists to score over 300 runs. They have come at a strike rate of 141.55 even though she hasn’t really gone hammer and tongs. With Shafali Verma, she has formed a formidable opening combination.Harmanpreet Kaur is never shy of expressing herself on the field•ICC/Getty Images”Australia have been always doing well ever since I have started playing and they always have great captains,” Harmanpreet, seated next to Lanning at the WPL final pre-match press conference, said. “With Meg, they always have a good team and it’s easy for her to make those changes and come up with a good challenge. In this WPL, they have a balanced side and she is leading from the front.”The biggest thing to learn from her is that she is not someone who is dependent on players. She is someone who leads from the front, like in this WPL. That’s something you want from a leader. When a leader takes responsibility from the front, the team does well. That’s something I always see and learn from her.”She is not someone who gives up early, we will have to fight till the end and we are ready for that.”That last line could also have been in reference to the semi-final last month, where for a large part of the chase India seemed in control before Australia wrested it back to knock them out.Just like on that day, Lanning knows she has another fight on her hands. “Coming up against Harman is always a good challenge,” she said. “She has shown that she is an excellent leader and gets results, both individually and for her team. I always look forward to challenges like that. Always a great contest to come up against a team led by Harman and I am expecting exactly the same tomorrow night.”So, once again in what is yet another landmark game in women’s cricket, Lanning and Harmanpreet are face to face. While the contest on the field will be intense, it has a celebratory feel to it as well. The smiles returned to both the captains’ faces as the presser drew to a close.” [We haven’t put the ropes. You should ask those who have],” Harmanpreet retorted when asked about the smaller size of the boundaries at this tournament, drawing laughs from the room.We are less than 24 hours from the first ever WPL final. And this time, whoever wins, whether it is Lanning or Harmanpreet, it will be a win for Indian cricket.

IPL trends – Close contests, 200-plus totals, and home disadvantage

Also, there may be a reason why spinners are seeing more success this season

Shiva Jayaraman26-Apr-2023As IPL 2023 moves beyond the half-way mark of the league stage, we look at four major trends that have stood out this season.The most closely fought season everThis IPL has perhaps seen the most evenly balanced contests among all seasons. Out of 34 matches, only 16 have been completely one-sided: where either the chasing team has won by at least three wickets with an over or more to spare, or the team defending has won by more than 15 runs. In terms of the percentage of such one-sided results, this season ranks the joint lowest at 45.7%.As many as 11 games this season have finished either with the chasing team falling short by fewer than 10 runs or winning by no more than one ball to spare. Almost one in three matches have been such ‘close’ finishes. Including wins by one wicket from previous seasons (there have been none so far this year with more than a ball remaining), no season has seen as many close games as the current one.On average, teams have played out two close games for every three one-sided games this season. No season has provided fans with more bang for their buck than this year.ESPNcricinfo LtdNumber of 200-plus scores more than ever, but are strike-rates really going up?There have been 16 200-plus totals scored in this IPL, only two short of the 18 scored in the entire season last year – the record for the most such totals in any season. Last year, there were 11 200-plus totals after 35 matches, so this season is likely to have more 200-plus totals than any of the previous seasons. There have also been 28 180-plus totals this season – also the most in any season of the league.

So have batters’ strike-rates taken a similar leap compared to previous seasons? Data suggests that may not be really the case. On average, batters have struck at 141.8 in first innings this year, which is their highest strike-rate after 35 matches in any season of the IPL. But it’s only marginally higher than the 2020 IPL, which had batters striking at 141.2 when batting first in the first 35 matches. Overall, including chases, batters have struck at 138.8 in the first 35 matches this year, which is just a fraction more than the previous highest of 138.7 at a similar stage, in 2018.What explains the glut of 200-plus totals then? One possible answer is in the scheduling. With the home-and-away format coming back and 11 venues being used, it wasn’t until the 20th game that a venue hosted its third match of the season. Ten of the 16 200-plus totals came in the first 19 matches.No season has had to wait till the 20th match for any venue to host for the third time. Jaipur is yet to host its second game of the season. Only 14 of the 35 matches so far have been played on grounds that had already hosted two matches – the lowest number of such matches in any season of the IPL. Last year, this number was 27.A comparison of run rates across seasons reveals that this season isn’t extraordinarily different from previous ones. In fact, three other seasons rank higher in terms of run rates on pitches, though only marginally so.The first half of this IPL has been played on fresher venues than all the previous seasons.

Impact Player rule gives spin a boostSpinner have taken 177 wickets this year, by far the most they have taken after 35 games in any season. They’ve bowled an average of 48.2 balls – little more than eight overs – per innings. This too is their highest in any season, but they aren’t bowling a lot more than they’ve done in earlier seasons. Their previous highest was only a shade lower at 47.6 balls per innings in 2019. That was also the last time that the IPL was played in the home-and-away format. The year before that in 2018, they bowled 46.5 balls per innings on an average.So why are spinners taking more wickets this year?The Impact Player rule has allowed teams to play an extra spinner of quality, who otherwise wouldn’t have made the XI. Kolkata Knight Riders play Suyash Sharma, swapping him for Venkatesh Iyer, who otherwise would have filled in as the sixth bowler. Lucknow Super Giants have used Amit Mishra. Rajasthan Royals also brought in Adam Zampa against Chennai Super Kings as their third spinner. He is currently seventh in the ICC rankings for T20 bowlers. These would have been the ‘easy’ overs for opposition to capitalise on but for the Impact Player rule.This increase in quality reflects in spinners’ combined strike-rate this season. They have taken a wicket every 19.1 balls. This is the first IPL season in which their strike rate has been below 20 after 35 matches.ESPNcricinfo LtdGood tosses to lose, and the home disadvantageIn previous seasons, teams that chased had a major advantage with dew around at night. It was a given that teams would elect to field first on winning the toss. They continue to do that in this season as well. In 31 out of the 35 games, teams have chosen to field.However, chasing teams have won only 15 of the 35 games so far. Their win percentage of 42.8 is the third lowest among the 16 seasons of the IPL. Hence, results have not been impacted by the toss as much as they have in previous years.Winning the toss should hand home teams a massive advantage, in theory: they get the best of the conditions tailor-made to suit their team. However, home teams have not been able to capitalise on winning the toss: in 16 of the 17 matches when home teams have won the toss, they have chased, and won only six matches.Overall, the win percentage of 42.9% for home teams this season is the joint lowest after 35 games of the 12 seasons played entirely in India.

De Kock's relationship with ODIs is complicated, but it's clear he cares

The South Africa batter says he finds the format “tiring”, but don’t let that fool you into thinking it means nothing to him

Firdose Moonda11-Oct-2023If you want to know whether Quinton de Kock cares about ODI cricket, watch his reaction after he scored his 50-over World Cup ton against Sri Lanka. There’s the power of the pull shot and then the passion of the wide-legged stance, the fist pump, the raised bat and the roar, followed by the pathos of the glint in the eye. Was it sweat or a tear? We may never know but we know enough: that hundred meant .”It was big,” de Kock said, typically poker-faced in Lucknow, ahead of South Africa’s next match against Australia. “Not just because it was a World Cup, but because I’ve been wanting a hundred for a while. I’ve got a couple of starts and then obviously I was not capitalising so just to get one again was pretty nice.”Before South Africa’s tournament opener, de Kock’s last ODI hundred came 20 months and 18 innings ago. Since then, he has scored three fifties, reached double figures 13 times, notched up a first T20I century, signed up for leagues including the MLC and the Big Bash and announced his retirement from the 50-over game. This World Cup is his last dance in the format in which he is, by a distance, the leading run-scorer of this generation of South Africans. He has 6276 ODI runs; the next most in the squad is David Miller, more than 2,000 runs behind. Overall, de Kock is seventh on South Africa’s all-time list and only Hashim Amla, AB de Villiers and Herschelle Gibbs have more ODI hundreds than him. Whatever else happens in this World Cup, de Kock will go down as one of South Africa’s most celebrated white-ball cricketers.Related

  • Cummins and ODIs, not quite a love story just yet

  • Storied World Cup rivals joust again but it is Australia under pressure

  • De Kock on ODI retirement: 'Time to get final top-up in T20 leagues'

Potentially, his farewell in the format also puts a(nother) question mark at the end of the sentence about the future of this format, although the man himself believes there is life in it.”I’m not going to speak on behalf of everyone. For myself, I find it quite tiring, but I’m sure there’s still a lot of guys, a lot of youngsters coming through from school, who would love to play this format,” he said. “I highly recommend that they find a way to keep it going, because there are a lot of guys with big ambitions who want this format to carry on. I think they need to find a place and a time for it to happen.””They” are the administrators, with whom de Kock has not always had the best of relationships but who may still be interested in his thoughts over the longevity of ODI cricket and the value of it. Ultimately, it was ODI cricket that made de Kock, after his three centuries against India in 2013, long before he was a T20 star. The longer limited-overs version allowed him time to build both his innings and his confidence and though cricket and its skills development has changed in the decade since de Kock debuted, he is an example of the kind of player ODIs can produce. He is also an example – maybe one of the last ones – of what ODI cricket can mean to players.For de Kock and this generation, a 50-over World Cup trophy is still the ultimate prize, even as the lure of T20s grows stronger. De Kock is one of those who have hung around, hoping for success in ODIs, when he could have walked away. He cares about it, even though his usually deadpan expressions and monotone and sometimes monosyllabic answers to questions, make it easy and lazy to assume he doesn’t.Aiden Markram, Rassie van der Dussen, Quinton de Kock – the three centurions against Sri Lanka•ICC via Getty ImagesDuring the recent series against Australia, de Kock spoke to the host broadcaster about his decision to focus solely on the shortest format and said that his loyalty to the national cause was what kept him on the ODI stage for the last five years. By his calculations, he could have walked away in 2018, cashed in on the T20 circuit and had his feet up by now.Instead, he is putting the fishing on hold to play his third 50-over World Cup and has started by showing he is willing to give it his all. His hundred against Sri Lanka laid the foundation for South Africa to break the World Cup batting record and, along with Rassie van der Dussen, provided the stability for Aiden Markram to score the fastest tournament hundred. And de Kock wasn’t the only one who let his emotions out that day.

“We’re doing really well as a batting unit and we’ve worked really hard on our game over the last couple of years but it’s only one game into the World Cup”de Kock doesn’t want South Africa to get too carried away by their start

All three South Africans who scored centuries against Sri Lanka were more animated than usual. That may be because the sense of belief in their own abilities is building but de Kock is still cautious.”We’re doing really well as a batting unit and we’ve worked really hard on our game over the last couple of years but it’s only one game into the World Cup,” he said. “So it’s hard to say how we are really going even though we managed really well in our last couple of games. The batting form hasn’t been over the course of years, it’s only been over a month or a couple of months. In order for us to be the best, we still need to be a bit more consistent, especially in tight games, like World Cups. That will determine how good we actually are.”South Africa’s only measure for how good they actually are, so far, is that they have not won a World Cup. For a squad that has always oozed talent that is something they want to change, especially as their most talented players, like de Kock, may not play in this format for much longer. Does that add extra motivation to this campaign? De Kock was not convinced.”I’m pretty much the same whether I’ve announced that I’ve retired or not retired,” he said. “I don’t really know how it happened. It was just a matter of working on one or two things and going out there and getting it done.”As simple as that.

Bat, analyse, brainstorm, repeat: Gill preps hard for left-arm pace exam

The India opener took part in every training session leading up to the Super Four game against Pakistan, and batted long hours

S Sudarshanan09-Sep-20231:44

Gill on the challenge of facing Pakistan’s bowlers

It is like the process you followed for your math exam. Prepare hard, solve a few problems – the more complex the better – to ready yourself for the toughest questions.In Colombo, Shubman Gill has been that guy. India had two optional nets and one full session under lights in the days leading up to their Asia Cup Super Four game against Pakistan. Gill took part in every one of them – even the optional training on Thursday and Saturday – and batted long hours. After all, he will be keen to perform better than the last time he faced Pakistan, which was in the group stage where he made 10 off 32 balls.Face left-arm throwdowns, work consciously on the forward stride, look at footage, chat with the batting coach, and repeat. Gill had his nets routine pretty much set on each of the first two days. Last week was the first time he had played against Pakistan in senior men’s cricket. Given India could play them at least three times – if both teams make the Asia Cup final – in the next couple of months, he left no stone unturned to be ready.Related

  • How Shubman Gill took down Shaheen Shah Afridi to hand round one to India

  • Gill, Afridi among big gainers in ICC ODI rankings

  • Ind vs Pak the only Asia Cup Super Four game with a reserve day

  • Rain, Rahul's return on the radar in India vs Pakistan rematch

So much has Gill faced Nuwan Seneviratne, India’s left-arm throwdown specialist, throughout the tournament that it wouldn’t be a surprise if he had the Sri Lankan on speed dial. The indoor nets on Thursday was all about getting his footwork right against left-arm over-the-wicket angle and, importantly, not falling over while playing deliveries straightening into him.”[Seneviratne] has been with us for the past seven-eight years,” Gill said before training. “We have two right-arm throwdown side-arm specialists, and as a variation, we also have a left-arm side-arm specialist. It helps in various conditions.”On Saturday, it was a tad different. His training on the eve of the India-Pakistan match was about the hard lengths. It was perhaps the shortest batting stint he had had in the nets all Asia Cup.Shubman Gill made 10 off 32 in the opening match of the Asia Cup•Getty ImagesHaving survived probing spells from Shaheen Shah Afridi and Naseem Shah, Gill fell to first-change Haris Rauf in the last meeting against Pakistan. It was an in-between length that he inside-edged onto his stumps.He worked on picking lengths early and putting them away. He received a good mix of full and hard-length deliveries, and a few bumpers along the way. It was not the prettiest Gill net to watch: he was beaten on both edges, edged a few balls, and lost his off stump once. He had a short chat with batting coach Vikram Rathour and continued for about 15 minutes more.”Shaheen swings the ball more. Naseem relies more on pace,” Gill said. “If he gets help from the surface, he hits good areas. Both are different bowlers and pose different challenges.”Before getting to [international] level, every batter would have faced left-arm bowling at some stage. Whenever you play a new bowler it makes a difference, [more so] because we don’t play Pakistan as often as we do some other teams. Coming up against a quality bowling attack like Pakistan’s, [not having played them that often before] makes a difference.”Sometimes there’s no technical flaw as such. Bowlers are also there to bowl, and you might get some good deliveries. You might get some unfortunate dismissals. When you are playing well there might be a few things going your way. You have to trust your game, back yourself and get those quick runs.”The prep’s done, and Gill will hope it translates into runs as he faces Sunday’s big test.

Defending champions England seek World Cup encore despite ageing stars

Ben Stokes is back from ODI retirement and Joe Root’s recent form isn’t inspiring. But England remain among favourites

Matt Roller29-Sep-20232:49

Can England defend their World Cup title?

World Cup pedigree: England are in uncharted territory as defending champions, sneaking past New Zealand on boundary count to win their maiden title at Lord’s four years ago. Once the laughing stock of one-day cricket – from 1992 and before the 2019 semi-finals, they hadn’t won a single knockout game at a 50-over World Cup – they are now among the favourites at every limited-overs ICC event.Recent form: This squad’s only meaningful preparation was last month, when they came from 0-1 down to beat New Zealand 3-1. England had only played nine ODIs in the preceding 13 months, and the entire World Cup squad rested during their recent 1-0 win against Ireland. Bilateral results have been considered low priority since Matthew Mott’s appointment as white-ball coach last year; after all, in 2022, his side peaked at the right time to lift the T20 World Cup in Australia.Selection: Ben Stokes returns as a specialist batter after a brief ODI retirement, while Harry Brook was a late replacement for Jason Roy. England have picked six seamers, anticipating niggles and a variety of conditions across their nine group games in eight different cities, while Jofra Archer will travel as a reserve.Related

England rope in Indian sidearm specialist for World Cup prep

Jason Roy axed from World Cup squad, Harry Brook included

Brook vs Malan vs Roy – How three into two couldn't go

Matthew Mott keeping World Cup reserve options open after show of power from back-up batters

Squad: Jonny Bairstow, Dawid Malan, Joe Root, Ben Stokes, Jos Buttler (capt, wk), Liam Livingstone, Moeen Ali, Sam Curran, Chris Woakes, Adil Rashid, Mark Wood, Harry Brook, David Willey, Reece Topley and Gus AtkinsonKey player: He has hardly played 50-over cricket in the last four years, but Joe Root was England’s leading run-scorer at the 2019 World Cup, and his fortunes as their fulcrum at No. 3 may decide their progress. Root is England’s best player of spin, and spent two months preparing for this World Cup while running drinks for Rajasthan Royals at the IPL earlier this year. Root will hope that tailored preparation can help him overcome a lean run in ODIs, having played just 19 of them since the 2019 World Cup, with three half-centuries and no hundreds.Rising star: Although an established all-format international and already an IPL millionaire, Sam Curran is the second-youngest player in England’s squad at 25, and is more likely to play a significant role than Brook, the designated spare batter. Curran has only played 26 ODIs, and his numbers do not stand out either, but he proved in Australia last year that he revels on the big stage. Expect him to be used in a variety of roles across the tournament.World Cup farewells? Where to start? Only three players in England’s squad are younger than 29, and most members will be in their late 30s by the time the 2027 World Cup comes around. There will almost certainly be a substantial changing of the guard after this tournament, and several members of the touring party are unlikely to feature in ODIs again, including Stokes, Moeen Ali and Chris Woakes.

Flying under the radar or not, South Africa seem to have figured themselves out

With quiet confidence, they are continuing to announce their presence at the World Cup

Firdose Moonda12-Oct-20231:40

Steyn: South Africa bowlers had the energy that Australia lacked

Kagiso Rabada was not so much laughing at Steven Smith as with technology when the big screen flashed three reds. It confirmed that the delivery Rabada bowled, which straightened from middle stump and struck Smith high on the pad would go on to hit leg stump, something very few people, other than Quinton de Kock, thought would happen.It was on de Kock’s nod that Temba Bavuma decided to review what seemed an appeal for appealing’s sake. On immediate assessment, the ball appeared to be missing leg even going over the stumps. Rabada himself was “hoping for an umpire’s call,” so South Africa could retain the review and Smith would be temporarily stopped from taking him on. The previous two balls were hit for four and Smith looked in imperious form but with the help of the DRS, his stay was cut short and Rabada created an opening into Australia’s middle-order. It was as good a time as any to have a chuckle.Related

Gerald Coetzee: A scary all-round package in the making

Can Netherlands surprise red-hot South Africa once again?

South Africa rock around de Kock

South Africa's rise between the World Cups of 2019 and 2023

De Kock's relationship with ODIs is complicated, but it's clear he cares

The significance of that wicket lies both in the fact that it was Smith who was dismissed and that it was Rabada who did the dismissing and the events it triggered. The pair have history, of course, dating back to 2018 when Rabada’s shoulder made contact with Smith as he celebrated removing him in a Test match at St George’s Park. Then, the incident sparked the unraveling of Australia in a series now known as Sandpapergate. This time, it also prompted a collapse: Australia lost four wickets for 20 runs starting with Smith and Rabada was responsible for three of them.He cleaned Josh Inglis up – a wicket that was clearly a wicket – and had Marcus Stoinis caught behind off the bottom glove, which may or may not have been in contact with the top glove. Technology, again, smiled on South Africa.But it would be grossly unfair on South Africa to attach their win to the gains they made on the DRS – though it is worth mentioning that the only time Australia asked for a review on the field half-heartedly was when they thought Quinton de Kock had nicked off Cummins and UltraEdge showed only a flat line – and not give credit to a flexible batting blueprint backed up by potent attack. Unlike in Delhi, where South Africa could capitalise on the last 10 overs, where they scored 137 runs against Sri Lanka, on a surface that slowed up in Lucknow, they had to start well and did.De Kock and Temba Bavuma are now South Africa’s most successful opening pair by average and have shared four century stands. De Kock, freed from the burdens of continuing in this format post the World Cup, is playing as well as he has ever done but that does not mean he is doing it recklessly. In fact, his starts have become more circumspect, his shot selection more careful and his understanding of his scoring areas more clear. Today, he targeted the short boundary, just 63 metres square of the wicket and played a selection of reverse-sweeps just wide of that in a display of pinpoint placement.That de Kock is having a good World Cup so far after South Africa’s poor showing in 2019 bodes well for the team; that Rabada is, is even better.Kagiso Rabada and Lungi Ngidi were on fire with the ball•Getty ImagesFour years ago, Rabada was bowling in an attack that was supposed to be led by Dale Steyn, who ended up having to withdraw with a shoulder injury. Now, he is supposed to lead the attack – which is without its most intimidating quick Anrich Nortje and its death bowling specialist Sisanda Magala – and is also supposed to do it from first change. South Africa have made what Rabada called a “team decision,” to open the bowling with Lungi Ngidi and Marco Jansen in a search for any early swing. That paid off handsomely in Lucknow.While the heat of the day was leaving the city, it found a home in South Africa’s new ball bowlers, Ngidi in particular. His opening spell of five overs included two scoreless ones and the wicket of David Warner, cost nine runs and was consistently delivered at 144 kph. He stuck to back of a length and maintained tight lines and said after the match that he feels fitter and stronger than before. Given who South Africa are missing, that’s good news.South Africa are also demonstrating qualities of adaptation that are needed in a long tournament across various venues. In Delhi, they picked four seamers and a spinner, in Lucknow, they opted for a three-two combination on a surface that was expected to, and did, offer some turn. By the time Keshav Maharaj and Tabraiz Shamsi were called on, the bulk of the damage was already done and there may still be questions over how quickly they cleaned up the Australian tail. For Rabada, South Africa played ‘pretty much the perfect game.”Over the last seven years, they have an exceptional record against Australia and had beaten them in 15 out of 20 ODIs before today, including winning a recent home series 3-2. That was the only competitive cricket South Africa played between April and this World Cup. Australia, on the other hand, have competed in an Ashes, a white-ball series in England and South Africa and played ODIs in India before the tournament and could, understandably, be spent. Their fielding performance suggested as much and the crowd kept a tally of their missed chances and displayed them on a banner to remind them how much they were getting wrong. It would also be that given the recent results, South Africa have figured Australia out. But there’s another option here. It could also be that South Africa have finally figured themselves – the squad that came to this World Cup – out.Their bowlers came into this tournament with some big names and reputations but without Nortje and Magala were very much seen as the supporting cast to their stellar top six, who are expected to set the tone. It’s helped that they were put in to bat in both matches and have yet to be tested in a chase. It has also helped that they have come in under the radar in both their own country and this one. South Africans are focused on the Springboks – who play a Rugby World Cup quarter-final against hosts France – this weekend and in India, the focus is on the home team, on England, on Pakistan and now, on whether Australia can get back on track.Perhaps quietly, that has given South Africa the opportunity to have a laugh amongst themselves as they continue to announce their presence at this event. But is it too early to dare to dream? Obviously.”We’re still a long way away but there are plenty of positives to take. It’s just about leaving this behind once we leave that behind and focus on the next game, that’s it,” Rabada said.And for now, that’s it that we’ll say about South Africa.

Game
Register
Service
Bonus